Dan Fisher
Dan Fisher

With over 35 years in the financial industry, Dan M. Fisher has proven himself as a leader in the financial industry holding roles as the former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and former Chairman of the ABA Payment Committee.

PIN or signature? Here we go again!

Merchants are attacking the card brands again about the right to choose between PIN and signature. They are creating quite a kerfuffle.  The issue has to do with the Durbin amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act and the right of merchants to have the choice when switching pinned transactions.

  • Merchants want to drive consumers to use their PIN option—it’s less expensive to process.
  • Financial institutions want to drive consumers to use the signature debit option—it generates more revenue.

The choice of signature debit or pinned debit as the type of transaction is not addressed in Dodd-Frank, only the merchants’ right to switch pinned transactions through a less-expensive processing route.  Consequently, when consumers at the point of sale select the signature debit preference as they use their new EMV card—as occurs in the case of most community banks and credit unions—this drives the transactions to the higher revenue source and merchants are frustrated.

Legally speaking …

The question then presents itself: Can merchants establish a rule to only accept PIN debit transactions? Or at least require consumers and businesses to use the pinned debit option at their store?

  • Under Visa and MasterCard rules: No!
  • Under Dodd-Frank: No!

What will happen next?

We most certainly will see more lawsuits and the card companies will fight them aggressively. Why? The reason is that the card companies and EFT processors are complying with the Durbin amendment. The intent of the law was to give merchants a choice in switching pinned transactions—not to require consumers and businesses to select pinned transaction option only.

Will Congress step in (again)?

I suspect that Visa and MasterCard will win this round. However, we may see more proposed legislation on this topic in the future. That’s pretty sure.

Will it pass? Maybe.

We may see the interchange cap population lowered from the $10 billion asset threshold to $5 billion in the next Congress as a concession. On the other hand, but I do not see the requirement to select pinned transactions being implemented.

At least that is my opinion. It is a matter of choice.

And in spite of the hurricanes ripping through so many areas of American life this election, I do not see the political winds in this area being strong enough to take away the choice!

—The Wombat!

get a free EFT review for interchange income
Dan Fisher
Dan Fisher

With over 35 years in the financial industry, Dan M. Fisher has proven himself as a leader in the financial industry holding roles as the former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and former Chairman of the ABA Payment Committee.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Join The Mailing List

The Copper River Group is a financial consulting firm that believes in the benefits technological advancement has for streamlining business.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
cea
cio